Who writes the Condor Research Journal, how we choose and check sources, how we use software tools, and how to report an error. This page applies to everything published under the Research Journal and to the explanatory text on our reference pages. It is maintained by the Condor Research Editorial Team, part of Atrio Sciences s.r.o. (IČO 57 669 651, Nitra, Slovak Republic).
Who writes our content
Articles are published under the byline Condor Research Editorial Team rather than under individual names. The team is responsible as a whole for what we publish, including accuracy, sourcing and corrections. Questions about any page can be sent to info@condorresearch.com and are answered by the team.
Our conflict of interest, stated plainly
Condor Research sells some of the compounds our articles discuss. Readers should know that before they read anything we write. To keep that interest from shaping the science:
- We describe what the published literature shows, including null results, failed trials, small sample sizes and the absence of human data, whether or not that is commercially convenient.
- Links to our own catalogue are placed apart from the scientific text and are recognisable as catalogue links.
- We do not publish sponsored articles, and no third party pays for coverage, placement or a favourable description.
How we choose sources
Every factual claim about a compound’s biology, chemistry or regulatory status is tied to a source the reader can open. In order of preference:
- Primary peer-reviewed research indexed on PubMed, cited with its PMID or DOI.
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, where they exist, ahead of narrative reviews.
- Official documents from regulators and standards bodies, such as the FDA, the EMA, WADA and national medicines agencies, cited to the original document rather than to press coverage of it.
- Clinical-trial registries (for example ClinicalTrials.gov) for trials that are ongoing or unpublished.
- Preprints, only when clearly labelled as not peer reviewed.
We do not cite vendor marketing, forum posts, social media or anonymous blogs as evidence for a scientific claim. When the evidence for something comes only from animal or cell models, we say so in the text.
How we check a page before it is published
- References are verified to exist. Every PMID and DOI is checked against PubMed or Crossref before publication. A citation that cannot be resolved is removed. Articles published before these checks were introduced are being re-audited against the same standard, and any citation that fails is corrected.
- Figures are traced. Numbers taken from a study (sample sizes, effect sizes, concentrations used in the cited models, dates) are checked against the cited source.
- Each page has to add something. Before we write, we ask what the page contains that is not already available elsewhere: original data, a synthesis nobody has published, a table we built, or an independent verification. If the answer is nothing, the page is not written. If the topic overlaps with a page we already have, we expand that page instead.
- Research-use-only framing. Our content describes research literature. It never gives dosing or administration guidance for people or animals, and never makes therapeutic claims. See our Research Use Only Disclaimer.
How we use software and AI tools
We use AI tools to search for and monitor the latest published research, and scripts that check references and page quality automatically. Our articles are written and edited by the Editorial Team, checked against their sources with the controls described above, and approved before publication. These tools do not decide what we publish. Since September 2026 every new or updated page passes these checks individually. Earlier articles are being reviewed against the same standard, and some have been merged or retired as a result.
Original data and studies
When we publish our own analyses, such as the State of Analytical Evidence in Research Peptides, 2026 or the ERR Agonist Evidence Atlas, we publish the method and its limitations alongside the results. Where possible we also provide the underlying data as a downloadable file, so others can check or reuse it. Where a figure is a lower bound or a non-randomised comparison, the page says so.
Updates
Research moves, and articles age. Each article shows the date it was last updated. When new studies, trial results or regulatory decisions change what an article should say, we revise the article rather than publishing a new one on the same topic.
Corrections
If you find an error (a wrong figure, a misread study, a broken or mismatched reference, or an outdated regulatory status), email info@condorresearch.com with the subject line “Correction”, the page address, and, if you can, the source that shows the error.
- We review correction requests as they arrive and aim to reply to every sender.
- Typos and formatting fixes are corrected silently.
- When a correction changes a fact, a figure or a conclusion, we correct the text and add a dated correction note to the page explaining what changed.
- We do not quietly remove an inconvenient finding. If a claim turns out to be unsupported, the correction note says so.
Contact
Condor Research Editorial Team · Atrio Sciences s.r.o., Hornočermánska 1556/76, 949 01 Nitra, Slovak Republic · info@condorresearch.com